SIDE-BY-SIDE COMPARISON
Variational Omni vs Hyperliquid
Compare published fees and activity. Figures can cover different product scopes and timestamps; higher activity does not guarantee better execution.
Normalized volume is a separate source-defined metric, not a wash-trading verdict. Amber observations are dated references or stale.
VVariational Omni
Omni provides quoted execution against its liquidity provider. Compare the executable quote with the market; a zero trading fee does not remove the spread.
- Open interest
- $1.00B
- Reported volume · 24h
- $3.51B·
- Normalized volume · 24h
- —
- Reported volume · 30d
- $42.55B·
- Maker / taker
- 0 bp / 0 bp
- Taker fee / $100k
- $0.00
- Fee schedule checked
- 22 Sept 2026
Omni. No opening or closing trading fees. Spreads, funding, liquidation and deposit/withdrawal charges are separate.
Official fee source ↗Variational protocol activity; fee example applies to Omni.
Open Variational Omni ↗Affiliate linkHHyperliquid
A perpetuals venue on a dedicated Layer 1. Review the market-specific book, fee tier, and position limits before sizing an order.
- Open interest
- $7.82B
- Reported volume · 24h
- $3.63B
- Normalized volume · 24h
- $12.64B·
- Reported volume · 30d
- $222.99B·
- Maker / taker
- 1.5 bp / 4.5 bp
- Taker fee / $100k
- $45.00
- Fee schedule checked
- 22 Sept 2026
Base tier · native perps. No staking or referral discount. HIP-3 deployer fees and growth-mode markets can differ.
Official fee source ↗Hyperliquid Perps as tracked by DefiLlama. Builder markets can overlap with separate listings; totals are not summed.
Open Hyperliquid ↗